Who Cut the Cheese?
By Larry Beane
This is a video released by Pastor Mark Junkans (LCMS) who serves a call at Lutheran Inter-City Coalition in Houston, Texas (Texas District).
Pr. Junkans uses the word "communion" - but it sounds more like a house party to me. Although I would prefer meat hors d'oeuvres or cocktail weenies, since I don't eat bread (Holy Communion excepted) - I would never attempt to bind consciences regarding the proper finger foods to go with Lutheran beverages. To each his own! Though (and I realize I am on shaky 8th Commandment and Matthew 18 ground here), I do think some research is in order to determine the propriety of omitting cheese in such contexts. Is this an adiaphoron? That question is certainly above my pay grade.
Passing around a bottle sounds like a great time (not that Lutheran pastors know anything about that...) - and is certainly of the order of First Article gifts. But I don't know if Pr. Junkans is trying to say this communion is a simply bunch of parishioners quaffing at a cocktail party, or rather if this is supposed to be the Holy Communion, the Sacrament of the Altar, the Holy Eucharist, the Mass, the body and blood of Christ?
At any rate, what about the cheese? Can we at least have consensus on that?
Maybe Pr. Junkans will clarify the matter. Maybe the Texas District President could help. I would be interested to know what President Harrison thinks, not to mention President Rast, as Pr. Junkans is a graduate of Fort Wayne's DELTO program. Reverend Presidents, we need direction on this caseous casuistry matter! Silence is not an option!
I am not being critical of Pr. Junkans. I know the rules of the synod. I'm not an ecclesiastical supervisor. Nor am I going to invest the time and money to try to meet my brother face to face to confront him about omitting cheese at an otherwise perfectly good cocktail party - as scandalous a matter as that might be - especially to our brethren in Wisconsin. Love covers a multitude of Sbrinz.
But I would like to know what those charged with ecclesiastical supervision do have to say about this. I mean, if we can't agree on something so basic, what does it mean to walk together?